This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—April 11

Policy

Judicial Nominee Wendy Vitter (Screengrab via Politico Watch)

2018—“Progressive fury” (as CNN puts it) is unleashed on federal district nominee Wendy Vitter for declining to opine at her confirmation hearing whether she believes that Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided. Malicious charges spread that Vitter supports racial segregation.

Never mind that, like many other nominees, Vitter took the position that it was improper for her to comment on the rightness or wrongness of any Supreme Court ruling. Never mind that she committed to apply all existing precedents. Never mind that she testified that racial segregation is immoral. Never mind that no one identified anything in her life or career to suggest that she is racially biased. Never mind that she has earned the support of Democrats like New Orleans mayor Mitch Landrieu (who, among other things, called for the removal of city monuments honoring leaders of the Confederacy).

What many on the Left really object to—or so it would seem from the questions posed at the hearing by Senate Democrats—is that Vitter is openly pro-life.

You Might Like

Articles You May Like

‘We aren’t going anywhere’ – TikTok vows court fight as new US law threatens to ban it
Weak, Compromised or Paid Off? Republicans Aid Democrats in the Destruction of America (VIDEO)
LIVE RESULTS: Pennsylvania, You’re Up!
UK’s ‘Rwanda Plan’ for Illegal Immigration an Effective Model for US: The BorderLine
Grandma helped her granddaughter beat up elementary school girl after sneaking into bathroom: Police

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *