“Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15“: Infamous words spoken by former Texas Democratic Rep. Beto O’Rourke, who just might become President Joe Biden’s gun czar.
As the mass shooting in Colorado become the next story to be used in the Democrats’ playbook, the left wasted no time in politicizing the tragedy to do away with Second Amendment rights in the name of safety and “gun control.” There’s only one problem: Nothing that they are proposing will do anything to stop anyone from murdering other people, warned BlazeTV host Mark Levin.
“This is about getting rid of the Second Amendment,” Levin stated. “There are efforts underway by the Democrat Party and their surrogates now to unleash litigation against gun manufacturers in order to prevent them from creating the products that you and I want to buy under the Second Amendment. There have been efforts underway to limit the number of bullets you can buy. There are all kids of proposals out there that have as their purpose to destroy the Second Amendment.”
Levin warned that if our constitutional rights, put in place to protect us from the federal government, can so easily be done away with through executive actions, this could be the perfect setup for Democrats to consolidate their power and trample the Bill of Rights.
“They want to exploit this massacre in Colorado,” he said of the Democrats. “They exploited the one in Atlanta for racial reasons, and now they want to exploit this one for gun reasons. You’re never going to have a ‘fix’ and you’re never going to have parties uniting. It’s politics all the time, 100 percent. And the Democrat Party is always about power, power over you. And whatever they pass it’s going to affect you if you’re a law-abiding citizen.”
Watch the video clip below to hear more from Mark Levin:
Want more from Mark Levin?
To enjoy more of “the Great One” — Mark Levin as you’ve never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.
Too effing bad you worthless POS LEFTWING COMMIE DEMORATS I can build any kind of firearm.YOU LOSE!
Have you ever wondered why there aren’t any Democrats on Mt. Rushmore? Me neither!
Thanks for pointing this out.
Gee, maybe they will put President Harris on Mount Rushmore, before her term has ended.
Where did it say Biden was taking your guns away? Or getting rid of the Second Amendment A-R should not be in the hands of a home owner. Hand guns are all that is needed nothing is being removed.
Tell that to Australia and other Countries that this has happened to.
AR stands for the manufacturer of the rifle which ARMORLITE RIFLES NIT-WIT.
Try hunting elk, bear, or moose, or antelope with a handgun. You might go hungry, you might end up dead. Anyway, I suggest you read the proposed bills before you sound off. It is a wholesale attack on the right to keep and bear arms. And by the way, most hunting rifles are far more powerful than any AR 15.
Hand guns are all that are needed? One proposal wants to ban all semi-automatic weapons. That leaves bolt and pump action rifles and revolvers. I dare ask how you have made such an intelligent statement?
Maria. As a police I could spend an hour explaining to you that your wrong. I’m just gonna go with your Wrong ! And this Criminals don’t follow laws. Sooooooo!
Maria, have u ever heard of the saying dumber in the head than a hog is in the ass??? NO, well you fit that saying to a tee…An AR is no more lethal than a hand gun…and YES the commie Dems are going to do away with the 2nd Amendment any way they possibly can so Commie China can invade without a gun behind every tree….people like you have no idea how close we are coming to loosing all freedoms we have.
Send Beto! Will need his soon to be widows address. She will need personal comfort after her old man is worm food.
Fred what kind of person would volunteer to cone to a gun owner’s home and try and take their gun?? A MORON? An IDIOT? Someone with a DEATH WISH?? YUP all three rolled into one a LIEberal Demoshit!!!
More people have been killed by kitchen knifes and tools,then by firearms per year. Something to really make you think,what’s going on with China’s military training Canada
YOU MIGHT WANT TO FORWARD THIS ONE… More people have been killed by Politicians with pens than have been killed in all the battles in all the wars! Consequently more lives will be saved by taking pens away from politicians than guns away from citizens
You forgot Ted Kennedy’s Car !
Just keep your weapons stashed what ever they are trying to do will be overturned some day after the dems are going to be obliterated from office. Keep your faith.
Have you ever noticed the same IDIOTS who claim it is physically impossible to round up and deport 12 million INFECTUM PRAEBUERNT DORSUM (wetbacks) are the same IDIOTS who claim they are going to locate and confiscate 300 plus million firearms from American citizens ???
If you are for gun control then you are not against guns, because guns will be needed to disarm people. So it’s not that you are anti-gun. You’ll need the Police’s guns to take away other people’s guns so in actually you are Pro-Gun. You just believe only the GOVERNMENT (which is so honest, reliable, virtuous, and moral) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun-control. There is only centralized gun ownership in the hands of a small political elite and their minions. In short It’s not gun control its POPULATION control!
If society is honest and historically accurate the only question that has any relevance to the gun control debate is, “Do you trust those in government, now and forever in the future, to not take your life, liberty, or property through the force of government? If the answer to that question is no the gun control debate is over!
Every Communist knows that political power comes from the barrel of a gun Mao Tse Tung 1938
Yep, and this is why democrats are dangerous liars and hypocrites. If they really believed Trump was a fascist—or that White Supremacy was an eminent threat to their security, why would they still be demanding Americans turn over their means of self-defense.
To the contrary, they’re doing just the opposite, defunding the police and putting us at greater risk to attacks by an overbearing government and left-wing radicals who have already shown a propensity for violence and mayhem. They’re nuts if they think this is going to happen at a time when democrats have made a hard-left turn towards tyranny.
When it comes to listening to fools who haven’t a fart’s chance in a tornado, to think I care about whether or not I am in compliance with some non-constitutional administrative ruling will be the least of my concerns, instead of listening to fools and traitors I WILL exercise ALL my God Given Constitutional rights not caring what some, one dimensional regressive politically correct lieberal bureaucrat wants!!! Instead I will focus on center mass, maintaining fire discipline, and assessing immediate threat vectors!
Let me make one thing perfectly clear, yes I am a Christian, and yes I carry a gun. One might think I carry a gun because I don’t trust God. Well you would be wrong. I have complete faith in my Lord; it’s crazed lunatics and an oppressive government that believes it has the right to dictate what I can and cannot have, can and cannot think or say, can and cannot eat or drink etc., I have no trust in! ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛABE. Molon Labe
Free men don’t ask for permission to bear arms!!!
”Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.”
Free men don’t ask for permission to bear arms!!! I will not go quietly into the night, and as long as there is breath in my body, I will rage against tyranny, enforced servitude, and injustice!!!
The men who authored the second amendment did not just finish a hunting trip. They just finished liberating a nation!!!!!
Free men don’t ask for permission to bear arms!!!
I will not go quietly into the night, and as long as there is breath in my body, I will rage against tyranny, enforced servitude, and injustice!!!
I will die on my feet as a patriot before I live on my knees as a subject!!! The only time I will be on my knees is to return fire and before the Lord God Almighty!!!
Libertas est, non liber – mercedem mihi portionem substantiae sumptus
Libertas inaestimabilis res est
Celer Silens Mortalis
Semper-Fidelis
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛABE
Excellent. Love the Latin also (studied it in 8th grade back in 1970). Molon Labe brother.
YEAH! Barrett 50 cal setup in living room pointed at front door.
If we’re going to start eliminating Constitutional rights because one person abuses them then free speech and free press should get the axe before the right to bear arms. Of course, you’d have to take away people’s guns before you can take away their First Amendment rights, so don’t be surprised when it happens if they manage to push the current agenda.
In case you hadn’t noticed, they’re after them as well.
And who, precisely, is going to come and take them? The police are our friends and neighbors and live among us. Not them. The military is undermanned. And if they out-price ammunition we’ll make our own. Disarming America would be a fool’s errand.
Ask the Jews about their predecessor’s giving up their arms and their one way trips to the ovens. White people are the new Jews, one course in CRT will tell you that if you are forced to attend a session. One CRT trainer is even on video calling Whites sub human. Once disarmed and silenced how do you think it will work out for you?
If they wanted to stop mass killings they would stop the murdering of innocent unborn Babies.
Hey all, please remember this one saying and it will be all over…..
“GUN CONTROL IS HITTING YOUR TARGET EVERY TIME”
Now stick that in your pipe and smoke it!!!!!
The Tree of Liberty from time to time requires the Blood of Patriots to remain strong.History, it seems, is repeating itself with a new set of actors.Taxation,threats of gun confiscation, Constitutional Rights and Liberties being ignored and abused by the very people we elected and trusted to provide We The People with Safety, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.Where will the Shot Heard ‘Round the World be fired next?
Justice Amy Coney Barrett Second Amendment dilemma
In some 225 years neither law professors, academic scholars, teachers, students, lawyers or congressional legislators after much debate have not been able to satisfactorily explain or demonstrate the Framers intended purpose of Second Amendment of the Constitution. I had taken up that challenge allowing Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s dilemma to understand the true intent of the Second Amendment.
I will relate further by demonstration, the intent of the Framers, my understanding using the associated wording to explain. The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Militia, a body of citizens organized for military service.
If, as some may argue, the Second Amendment’s “militia” meaning is that every person has a right to keep and bear arms, the only way to describe ones right as a private individual is not as a “militia” but as a “person.” (The individual personality of a human being: self)
The 4th Amendment reminds us, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons….”
The Article of Confederation lists eleven (11) references to“person/s.” The Constitution lists “person” or “persons” 49 times to explicitly describe, clarify and mandate a constitutional legal standing as to a “person” his or her constitutional duty and rights, what he or she can do or not do.
It’s not enough to just say “person/s” is mentioned in the United States Constitution 49 times, but to see it for yourself (forgo listing), and the realization was for the concern envisioned by the Framers that every person be secure in these rights explicitly spelled out, referenced and understood how these rights were to be applied to that “person.”
Whereas, in the Second Amendment any reference to “person” is not to be found. Was there a reason? Which leaves the obvious question, why did the Framers use the noun “person/s” as liberally as they did throughout the Constitution 49 times and not apply this understanding to explicitly convey the same legal standard in defining an individual “persons” right to bear arms as a person?
Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissent in Barr v Kanter (2019) Second Amendment argument acquiesced to 42 references to “person/s, of which 13 characterize either a gun or firearm. Her Second Amendment, “textualism” approach having zero reference to “person/s. Justice Barrett’s view only recognizes “person/s” in Barr, as well in her many other 7th circuit rulings. It is her refusal to acknowledge, recognize or connect the U.S. Constitution benchmark legislative interpretive precept language of “person/s,” mandated in our Constitution 49 times, to the Second Amendment.
Leaving Supreme Court Justice Barrett’s judgment in question.
In the entire U.S. Constitution “militia” is mentioned 5 times. In these references there is no mention of “person” or “persons.” One reference to “people” in the Second Amendment. People, meaning not a person but persons in describing militia.
Now comes the word “shall” mentioned in the Constitution 100 times. SHALL; ought to, must ..
And interestingly, the word “shall” appears in the Second Amendment. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, and shall not be infringed.”
“[S]hall not be infringed.” Adding another word “infringed” to clarify any misunderstanding as to the intent of the Second Amendment. Infringe. To encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another;
The condition “Infringe” has put a stop as to any counter thoughts regarding the Second Amendment, as you shall not infringe or encroach on beliefs other to what is evident as to the subject “Militia.”
Finally, clarifying “..the right of the people to keep and bear arms…
People. Human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest.
In closing, I am not against guns, everybody has them. I’m against using the Second Amendment illogically as a crutch. If it makes those feel better so be it. Just what it deserves, use it with a wink.
William Heino Sr.