NY Times: CNN’s PR Chief Was Helpfully Steering Andrew Cuomo Interviews

Breaking News

We may suggest it was obvious that CNN was deeply compromised by the way it serially promoted then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York in the early months of the pandemic in 2020, but now The New York Times is reporting it’s more corrupt than the first impressions. The front page on Saturday carried the headline “CNN Executive Let Ex-Governor Steer Interviews, Inquiry Finds.

The executive was PR chief Allison Gollust, the one who was having an affair with CNN boss Jeff Zucker. Reporters Michael M. Grynbaum, John Koblin and Emily Steel focused on a late-afternoon March 28, 2020 Newsroom interview with then-weekend anchor Ana Cabrera. 

Governor Cuomo had told a senior CNN executive, Allison Gollust, about subjects that he’d like to be asked about on air, according to several people familiar with the matter. Ms. Gollust, CNN’s longtime chief of communications and marketing and a former top aide of the governor, passed along the topics to CNN producers and then reported back to the governor.

Done,” she wrote.

On Tuesday, Ms. Gollust was forced to resign from CNN after an internal investigation found a trove of written communications between her and Governor Cuomo, including messages about the March 2020 appearance, the people said…. 

The episode is the latest example of how closely entwined CNN’s leadership was with one of the country’s most prominent Democratic politicians.

It’s common for TV producers to tell guests in advance what the subject or subjects of the interview will be. With a major newsmaker, there may be a deeper discussion over whether the newsmaker has something newsworthy to say. But this was more like CNN taking dictation from Cuomo. 

The Cravath investigators also uncovered extensive written communications between Governor Cuomo and Ms. Gollust, who had briefly worked for the governor in late 2012 and early 2013, the people said.

It wasn’t clear what all of those communications were about.

But investigators found messages during the pandemic in which Governor Cuomo informed Ms. Gollust about three specific subjects that he wanted to be covered during a March 28, 2020, appearance at CNN, the people said.

They said those topics included his recent phone conversation with Mr. Trump and the effect of New York’s being placed under lockdown.

Ms. Gollust then sent messages to CNN staff requesting that the governor be asked about those subjects.

The Cravath lawyers reviewed broadcast transcripts that showed that the anchor asked about the subjects that Ms. Gollust had put forward, the people said.

Ms. Heller, the spokeswoman for Ms. Gollust, said that Ms. Gollust “acted as the principal booker for Governor Cuomo during the early days of the pandemic” and that her role was “well known by the entire network.”

In CNN’s “Reliable Sources” newsletter, reporter Oliver Darcy attempts to spin it: “A careful read of the interview transcript at issue shows a probing Q&A and no signs of interference or Cuomo coziness.” 

You Might Like

Wrong. The questions during this interview, which lasted more than 18 minutes, were set-ups for the Governor, starting with “What’s your reaction to what you just heard?”

Click on “Expand” for a sense of how Cuomo received questions that could easily have been just the questions Cuomo requested: 

CABRERA: Do you have any problem with the idea of there being travel restrictions? Essentially what I heard from the president is perhaps New Yorkers couldn’t leave the state.

CUOMO: Well, that’s not a quarantine. That would be a lockdown. If you said we’re geographically confining people, that would be a lockdown. Then we would be Wuhan, China. And that wouldn’t make sense.

This is a time the president says he is trying to restart the economy. New York is the financial sector. You geographically restrict a state, you would paralyze the financial sector. You think the Dow Jones, the stock market has gone down, it would drop like a stone.

CABRERA: What if that is what he wants. What if he wants a lockdown? Would you sue to stop him? You said you don’t think it is legal.

CUOMO: Look, a lockdown is what they did in Wuhan, China, and we’re not in China, and we’re not in Wuhan. I don’t believe it would be legal. I believe it would be legal. I believe it would be illegal….

CABRERA: On that point you made about the financial sector, about being able to have interstate commerce, and also the financial sectors, it is the heart of Manhattan, right? What would this mean for the stock market? Would it have to shut down?

CUOMO: Oh, it would drop like a stone. I mean, I don’t know if it would operationally have to shut down, but it may as well shut down….

CABRERA: The New York Stock Exchange specifically — I’m sorry, I don’t mean to interrupt you. There’s a slight delay with our signal here. I was thinking about the New York Stock Exchange. Obviously, if it is again, a little vague now about the quarantine that he’s speaking of, but one point he mentioned New York City. I imagine there are a lot of people that go in and out of New York City that don’t live in the city, might be part of the New York Stock Exchange. That’s where I was thinking about an impact when it comes to the stock market, right?

CUOMO: Oh, no, you’re exactly right, Ana. There are people that come in and out all day long dealing with the stock exchange. There are meetings, I mean, thousands of people coming in and out that are directly related to the stock exchange.

And I know the president is concerned what happened to the stock market, we all are, I am as governor of New York, every person that has a retirement fund, watched the drop is concerned. So why you would want to just create total pandemonium on top of a pandemic I have no idea.

CABRERA: Well, if you think about the actions you took, right, when it came to New Rochelle, you put in a zone that was somewhat restrictive, and you did that in order to stop the spread. If there isn’t some kind of lockdown, how do you get it under control? How do you prevent the spread from getting worse?

CUOMO: We had the hottest cluster, if you will, the hottest hot spot in the United States of America, with New Rochelle, Westchester. We did something with the containment zone, closed school and no large gatherings. We never said you can’t come and go. We’ve never confined people’s mobility, imprisoned people in a geographic area, even in New Rochelle.

We called it a containment zone which was not the best word. It was to contain the virus, not people. We never contained anyone. I can’t remember the last time this country said we’re going to contain you in an area. Again, that’s why I think I don’t even believe it is legal.

CABRERA: I want to ask about the situation in New York. Stories we are hearing from hospital workers are not good. We see lines outside places like Elmhurst. What’s the status when it comes to ventilators in New York State? That’s been one of the big issues of concern for you.

CUOMO: Well, the ventilators, which, by the way, before this situation, nobody really gave a second thought to ventilators….

As for Gollust acting as Gov. Cuomo’s principal booker, Darcy claimed “Brian Stelter and I did not know this.” These reporters were in the dark about their own network — even as they touted its integrity.

Articles You May Like

‘Echoes of History’: CNN Implies Hungary’s Orban Will Launch a Second Holocaust
Comcast and Charter may need new focus as broadband growth stalls amid competition
Starbucks union asks coffee giant to extend pay hikes, benefits to unionized stores
On Abortion, Sharpton Declares ‘The Bible Is About Choice’
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones owes Sandy Hook parents $4.1m, jury determines

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.