Nicolle Wallace Again Floats ‘Drone Strikes’ as Solution to ‘Domestic Terrorism’

Political News

Nicolle Wallace has Republicans and drone strikes on the noggin.

Yesterday, we caught MSNBC analyst and former FBI agent Clint Watts saying on Wallace’s show that if Anwar Awlaki had said what Trump said, the result would be a “drone strike.”

Wallace took it an insane step further on her show this evening, saying:

We had a policy, and it was very controversial, it was carried out under the Bush years, and under the Obama years, of attacking terrorism at its root, of going after and killing, and in the case of Anwar Awlaki, an American, a Yemeni-American, with a drone strike for the crime of inciting violence, inciting terrorism.
 . . . 

The way you root out terrorism, is to take on, in the case of Islamic terrorism, kill those who incite it.

Wallace might claim she was only talking about Awlaki and Islamic terrorism. But for the second night running to, in any way, shape, or form, put incitement to “domestic terrorism” in the same breath as killing with “drone strikes” is deeply dangerous, and insane. Why was she possibly even talking about drone strikes in the context of dealing with domestic terrorism?

You Might Like

Again, as I wrote yesterday: “and the left shrieks about the right inciting violence?”

Nicolle Wallace once again airing the notion of dealing with “domestic terrorism” via “drone strikes” was sponsored in part by USAA and Otezla.

Here’s the transcript.

MSNBC
Deadline White House
1/29/21
5:34 pm ET

NICOLLE WALLACE: There’s a bulletin released to all law enforcement earlier this week, that there is, until the end of April, a persistent threat of domestic extremism, domestic terrorism carried out in the ideology and around this belief that the election was fraudulent, that the Covid restrictions are unnecessary. All of those ideologies pushed by Donald Trump.

But my question for you is around incitement. We had a policy, and it was very controversial, it was carried out under the Bush years, and under the Obama years, of attacking terrorism at its root, of going after and killing, and in the case of Anwar Awlaki, an American, a Yemeni-American, with a drone strike for the crime of inciting violence, inciting terrorism.

Mitch McConnell was in the Senate then. He was in the Senate after 9/11 too. How does Mitch McConnell, who understands that the way you root out terrorism, is to take on, in the case of Islamic terrorism, kill those who incite it. How does he not vote to convict someone that he said, on the floor of the Senate, incited an insurrection?
 

Articles You May Like

Group in Mexico Displays Flyers Urging Illegal Aliens to Vote for Biden
EU probe of weight loss and diabetes drugs like Wegovy, Ozempic finds no link to suicidal thoughts
Embattled NJ Dem accused of stealing money from Democratic club, previously charged with selling cocaine and meth to undercover cop
HOLY CRAP: Joe Biden Approved Iran’s Assault on Israel ‘Within Certain Limits’
Is War Imminent? How Should Israel Respond to Iranian Attack?

6 Comments

  1. So they are implying that Americans on American soil who disagree with the left’s views and oppose those views
    in the public forum should be compared to ISIS and summarily executed without a trial. These are the most dangerous times this country has ever faced when journalism becomes complicit with the state to dictate instead of govern according to the US Constitution. Goebbels, who controlled German media during Hitler’s reign and today the CCP’s full media control and assigning social credit scores to all citizens. You should be very afraid.

  2. President Trump only SPOKE TRUTH…… and ANYTHING polosi, scummer & ANY DEMORATS SAYS or SAID IS A LIE, MISSS TRUE, OR HALF TRUTH TO INCITE VIOLENCE… The demorats have been inciting violence for 5 years against Trump Family and anyone who support them.

  3. If Anwar Awlaki would have been hit with a drone strike for saying what President Trump said, then why has the idiotatola of Iran not been hit with one.
    He’s been chanting “Death to America” threats, and supporting terrorism for many years; evidently that isn’t a terroristic threat!!

  4. I guess the FOUNDING FATHERS never led a insurrection in order to form our Country? The reason we don’t have bad teeth and a Monarchy is because a band of people (our Founders) stood against what was WRONG, by being RIGHT. We must think about being the burr under the saddle at your school board meetings and local politics and RIGHT the ship by holding these leaders accountable. We must be allowed to voice opinions, and the left is “protesting too much” if they don’t have things to hide. My mother (RIP) would always know when we were fibbing by saying “Ye protest much too loudly”.

  5. It is becoming common knowledge, not only here in the U.S., but also throughout the world that the democrats are and have been THE ONES that have been somewhat behind the scenes, pushing for Antifa and BLM to “mix in” with patriot and conservative protestors while even being disguised as patriots, to incite violence at what would have been a peaceful protest if they had not done so! Everyone knows this!! The whole world!! They were even bailing them out of jail so they could return!! Our so called Vice President was behind bailing these extremists!! Then they and the MSM turn it all around to look like it was all conservatives to blame!! They look like fools to the rest of the world, as everyone knows how they operate! The democrats in Pelosi, AOC, Shumer( who hasn’t told the truth since he was 6 years old) the whole bunch should be charged with TREASON and for inciting violence!! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *